Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Kant, Copyright and Communicative Freedom

  • Published:
Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid recent expansion of copyright law worldwide has sparked efforts to defend the ‘public domain’ of non-propertized information, often on the ground that an expansive public domain is a condition of a ‘free culture’. Yet questions remain about why the public domain is worth defending, what exactly a free culture is, and what role (if any) authors’ rights might play in relation to it. From the standard liberal perspective shared by many critics of copyright expansionism, the protection of individual expression by means of marketable property rights in authors’ works serves as an engine of progress towards a fully competitive ‘marketplace of ideas’ – though only if balanced by an extensive public domain from which users may draw in the exercise of their own expressivity. This article shows that a significantly different, and arguably richer, conception of what a free culture is and how authors’ rights underpin it emerges from a direct engagement with the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. For Kant, progress towards a fully emancipated (i.e. a ‘mature’ or ‘enlightened’) culture can only be achieved through the critical intellectual activity that public communication demands: individual expressive freedom is only a condition, not constitutive, of this ‘freedom to make public use of one’s reason in all matters’. The main thesis defended in this article is that when Kant’s writings on publicity (critical public debate) are read in relation to his writings on the legal organization of publishing, a necessary connection emerges between authors’ rights – as distinct from copyrights – and what Jürgen Habermas and others have named the public sphere. I conclude that it is the public sphere, and not the public domain as such, that should serve as the key reference point in any evaluation of copyright law’s role in relation to the possibility of a free culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anne Barron, “Copyright Infringement, ‘Free-Riding’ and the Lifeworld” in L. Bently, J. Davis and J. Ginsburg (eds.) Copyright and Piracy: An Interdisciplinary Critique (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp.93-127

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Charles R. Beitz, “The Moral Rights of Creators of Artistic and Literary Works” Journal of Political Philosophy 13(3) (2005) pp.330-358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyla Benhabib, The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yochai Benkler, “Free as the Air to Common Use: First Amendment Constraints on Enclosure of the Public Domain” 74 (1999) New York University Law Review pp.354-446

    Google Scholar 

  • Yochai Benkler, “Siren Songs and Amish Children: Autonomy, Information and Law” 76 (2001) New York University Law Review pp.23-113

    Google Scholar 

  • Yochai Benkler, The Wealth of Networks (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • James Bohmann, “The Public Spheres of the World Citizen” In J. Bohmann and M. Lutz-Bachmann (eds.) Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997), pp. 179-200

    Google Scholar 

  • James Boyle, “The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain” Law & Contemporary Problems 66 (2003) pp.33-74

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, James and Lessig, Lawrence (eds.), ‘Cultural Environmentalism @ 10’, a special issue of Law and Contemporary Problems 70(2) (2007).

  • James Boyle, The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Sharon Byrd and Joachim Hruschka, Kant’s Doctrine of Right: A Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)

  • Georg Cavallar, Kant and the Theory and Practice of International Right (Cardiff: University of Wales Press 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph Chan, “Raz on Liberal Rights and Common Goods” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15 (1995) pp.15-31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olha O. Cherednychenko, “Fundamental Rights and Private Law: A Relationship of Subordination or Complementarity?” Utrecht Law Review 3(2) (2007) pp.1-25

    Google Scholar 

  • John Christman and Joel Anderson, Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), General Comment No. 17 U.N. Doc. E/C.12/GC/17 (Nov. 21, 2005).

  • Katerina Deligiorgi, Kant and the Culture of Enlightenment (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drahos, Peter with Braithwaite, John, Information Feudalism (London: Earthscan, 2002)

  • Abraham Drassinower, “A Rights-Based View of the Idea/Expression Dichotomy in Copyright Law” Canadian Journal of Law and & Jurisprudence 16 (2003) pp.3-21

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham Drassinower, “Taking User Rights Seriously” in Michael Geist, ed., In the Public Interest: The Future of Canadian Copyright Law, (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2005), pp.462-479

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham Drassinower, “Authorship as Public Address: On the Specificity of Copyright vis-à-vis Patent and Trade-Mark” Michigan State Law Review 1 (2008) pp.199

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham Drassinower, “From Distribution to Dialogue: Remarks on the Concept of Balance in Copyright Law” 34(4) (2009) Journal of Corporation Law pp. 991-1007

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham Drassinower, “Capturing Ideas: Copyright and the Law of First Possession” (2006) 54 Cleveland State Law Review 191

    Google Scholar 

  • Drassinower, Abraham, ‘Copyright Infringement as Compelled Speech’ (2011) (draft on file with the author).

  • Gerald Dworkin, The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elisabeth Ellis, Kant’s Politics: Provisional Theory for an Uncertain World (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichte, Johann G., ‘Proof of the Unlawfulness of Reprinting’ (Berlinische Monatschrift (1793), pp. 443–482), trans. Martha Woodmansee, in L. Bently and M. Kretschmer (eds.), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450–1900) (available at: www.copyrighthistory.org).

  • Katrin Flikschuh, Kant and Modern Political Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Katrin Flikschuh, Freedom: Contemporary Liberal Perspectives (Cambridge: Polity Press 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Christophe Geiger, “‘Constitutionalising’” Intellectual Property Law? The Influence of Fundamental Rights on Intellectual Property in the European Union” IIC 37 (2006) pp.371-406

    Google Scholar 

  • Dena Goodman, The Republic of Letters: A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucie M.C.R. Guibault, Copyright Limitations and Contracts (The Hague, London and Boston: Kluwer, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürgen Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (1962) (Cambridge: Polity, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • David Hesmondhalgh, The Cultural Industries 2nd ed. (London: Sage, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Otfried Höffe, Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony M. Honoré, “Ownership” in A. G. Guest (ed.) Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Oxford: Clarendon, 1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason (1781) (trans. P. Guyer and A. Wood) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

  • Immanuel Kant, “An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’” (1784) in Mary J. Gregor (ed.) Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998) pp.17-22

    Google Scholar 

  • Immanuel Kant, “On the Wrongfulness of Unauthorised Publication of Books” (1785) in Mary J. Gregor (ed.) Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998) pp.29-35

    Google Scholar 

  • Immanuel Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) in Mary J. Gregor (ed.) Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998), pp.41-108

    Google Scholar 

  • Immanuel Kant, “What is Orientation in Thinking” (1786) in H. Reiss (ed.) Kant’s Political Writings (2nd ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp.237-49

    Google Scholar 

  • Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason (1788) in Mary J. Gregor (ed.) Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998), pp.137-271

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment (1790) (trans. W. S. Pluhar) (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997).

  • Immanuel Kant, The Metaphysics of Morals (1797), in Mary J. Gregor (ed.) Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998), pp.353-603

    Google Scholar 

  • Immanuel Kant, “On the Common Saying: That may be Correct in Theory, but it is no use in Practice” (1793) in Mary J. Gregor (ed.) Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998), pp.279-309

    Google Scholar 

  • Immanuel Kant, “Toward Perpetual Peace” (1795) in Mary J. Gregor (ed.) Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998), pp.315-351

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (1798) (trans. M. J. Gregor) (Nijhoff: The Hague, 1974)

  • Christopher Kelty, Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Larry Krasnoff, “The Fact of Politics: History and Teleology in Kant” European Journal of Philosophy 2(1) (1994) pp. 22-40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay Lampert, “Locke, Fichte and Hegel on the Right to Property” in M. Baur and J. Russon (eds.) Hegel and the Tradition: Essays in Honour of H.S. Harris (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997), pp.40-73

    Google Scholar 

  • John Christian Laursen, “The Subversive Kant: The Vocabulary of ‘Public’ and ‘Publicity’” in J. Schmidt (ed.) What is Enlightenment? 18 th Century Answers and 20 th Century Questions (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1996) pp. 253-269

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark A. Lemley, “Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding” Texas Law Review 83 (2005) pp.1031-1075

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence Lessig, Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity (New York: Penguin, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert P. Merges, Justifying Intellectual Property (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859) (London: Penguin, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neil W. Netanel, “Alienability Restrictions and the Enhancement of Author Autonomy in United States and Continental Copyright Law” Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 12 (1994) 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Neil W. Netanel, Copyright’s Paradox (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Niesen, “Colonialism and Hospitality” Politics and Ethics Review 3(1) (2007) pp. 90–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onora O’Neill, Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Alan Patten, Hegel’s Idea of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas W. Pogge, “Kant’s Theory of Justice” Kant-Studien 79 (1988) pp.407-433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph Raz, The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyrill P. Rigamonti, “The Conceptual Transformation of Moral Rights” (2007) 55 American Journal of Comparative Law 67

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamela Samuelson, “Challenges in Mapping the Public Domain” in L. Guilbault and P. B. Hugenholtz (eds.) The Future of the Public Domain: Identifying the Commons in Information Law (Kluwer: Alphen aan den Rijn, 2006), pp. 7-25

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömholm, Stig, Le Droit Moral de l’Auteur (2 Vols.) (Stockholm: P.A. Norstedt & Söners Förlag, 1967).

  • Treiger-Bar-Am, Leslie Kim, ‘Kant on Copyright: Rights of Transformative Authorship’, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal (2008): 1059–1103.

  • Howard Williams, “Liberty, Equality and Independence: Core Concepts in Kant’s Political Philosophy” in G. Bird (ed.) A Companion to Kant (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 364-382

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond Williams, Culture (London: Fontana, 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen W. Wood, Kant’s Ethical Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen Wood, Hegel’s Ethical Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Barron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barron, A. Kant, Copyright and Communicative Freedom. Law and Philos 31, 1–48 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-011-9114-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-011-9114-1

Keywords

Navigation